Review





Similar Products

94
Miltenyi Biotec µmacs streptavidin kit
µmacs Streptavidin Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/custom%40130-133-282%4042413491?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
µmacs streptavidin kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec cd8 pe vio770 antibodies
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Cd8 Pe Vio770 Antibodies, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/pmc13164479-208-9-15?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd8 pe vio770 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Ciconia Inc leptoptilos crumenifer 263 282
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Leptoptilos Crumenifer 263 282, supplied by Ciconia Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__27__720532-93-36-24?v=Ciconia+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
leptoptilos crumenifer 263 282 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Mini-Circuits circuits zn12pd 252 s
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Circuits Zn12pd 252 S, supplied by Mini-Circuits, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/pm42045178-237-20-20?v=Mini-Circuits
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
circuits zn12pd 252 s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC htert ft 282 cell lines
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Htert Ft 282 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/pm42031698-146-3-12?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
htert ft 282 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC ovcar 8
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Ovcar 8, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/pm42031698-146-1-12?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ovcar 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Mini-Circuits aods
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Aods, supplied by Mini-Circuits, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__07__716805-170-21-17?v=Mini-Circuits
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aods - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MedChemExpress nile red staining 282 nile red powder
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Nile Red Staining 282 Nile Red Powder, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/pm41951050-138-2-10?v=MedChemExpress
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nile red staining 282 nile red powder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech 282 anti ki67
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
282 Anti Ki67, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/282s/pm41935320-102-29-23?v=Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
282 anti ki67 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Proinflammatory Cytokine Preconditioning Enhances the Therapeutic Potency of Different Types of MSCs in Inflammation

doi: 10.3390/ijms27094090

Figure Lengend Snippet: The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.

Article Snippet: The PBMCs were stained with anti-human CD3-APC-Vio770, CD4-APC and CD8-PE-Vio770 antibodies (Cat# 130-113-136, 130-113-222, 130-110-680; Miltenyi Biotec) for 30 min on ice in the dark.

Techniques: Inhibition, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay